Why one in four babies in this Karachi settlement arrive too soon

why-one-in-four-babies-in-this-karachi

Approvedtarik
6 blocks60.4s narration$1.3072 spent2 factsapproved 2026-08-03 03:04:25Receipt →

The film

The board

Six blocks, one per beat. Each card shows the provider that actually ran — a fallback nobody can see in the record is a substitution, not a fallback.

Block 1cold open

About one in four babies in the Pakistani fishing settlement of Rehri Goth are born prematurely. That is nearly double the national rate.

F1
9.24s
elevenlabs · eleven_v3
Block 2stakes

Premature birth means a child arrives before the lungs fully form. Around half of babies born this early in poor countries do not survive.

F2
10.59s
elevenlabs · eleven_v3
Block 3evidence

Researchers at Agha Khan University studied the bacteria in women's bodies. They found Prevotella copri was far scarcer in those who delivered prematurely.

F3
10.75s
elevenlabs · eleven_v3
Block 4evidence

Malnutrition, extreme heat, and poor sanitation all contribute to early birth in Rehri Goth. Researchers traced the pattern across the settlement's mothers and their pregnancies.

F4
10.31s
elevenlabs · eleven_v3
Block 5turn

Families often turn to Cerelac to feed premature infants. The World Health Organization warns it is not formulated to meet an infant's nutritional needs.

F5
10.24s
elevenlabs · eleven_v3
Block 6kicker

Improving education, water, and sanitation could solve half the premature birth problems in the community. The tools exist. They simply need to arrive.

F6
9.27s
elevenlabs · eleven_v3

Run log

Every submission, rejection, retry and take measurement, newest first. This is literally the audit trail rendered.

  1. 06:23:50decision.captionreject — instagram/1: this line asserts "poor countries" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. linkedin/1: this line asserts "fyezah jehan notes" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. youtube/1: this line asserts "poor countries" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. youtube/2: this line asserts "researchers found why" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim.
  2. 06:22:35decision.captionreject — linkedin/1: this line states "first" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim.
  3. 06:21:03decision.captionreject — instagram/1: this line states "half" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. linkedin/2: this line asserts "fyezah jehan notes" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. youtube/2: this line asserts "fyezah jehan says" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim.
  4. 06:18:50decision.captionreject — instagram/2: this line asserts "researchers discovered" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim.
  5. 06:17:40decision.captionreject — linkedin/1: the mapping quotes "One in four babies in a Karachi settlement are born prematurely, nearly double Pakistan's national rate", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. linkedin/1: the mapping quotes "improved education, water, and sanitation could address half the problem", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. linkedin/1: this line states "one", "four", "half" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. linkedin/1: this line asserts "pointing toward intervention strategies", "could address half", "improved education" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. linkedin/2: the mapping quotes "In Rehri Goth, 1 in 4 babies arrive too soon", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. linkedin/2: this line states "1", "4" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/1: the mapping quotes "One in four babies in this Pakistani settlement are born prematurely, nearly double the national rate", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. youtube/1: the mapping quotes "In Rehri Goth, malnutrition, extreme heat, and poor sanitation drive early births", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. youtube/1: this line states "one", "four" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim.
  6. 06:16:15decision.captionreject — checker unavailable (ProviderError: GMICloud chat failed: The read operation timed out) — blocked rather than assumed safe
  7. 06:11:41decision.captionreject — instagram/1: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. instagram/1: this line asserts "rehri goth", "create conditions", "early birth becomes" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. instagram/2: the mapping quotes "For babies born around 32 weeks in poor countries, half don't survive", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. instagram/2: this line states "32", "half", "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. linkedin/1: this line asserts "learn how" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. linkedin/2: this line asserts "fyezah jehan", "research suggests" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. youtube/1: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/2: this line asserts "agha khan university found something striking" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim.
  8. 06:09:39decision.captionreject — instagram/1: this line asserts "rehri goth" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. linkedin/1: this line asserts "real breakthrough" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim.
  9. 06:07:04decision.captionreject — instagram/1: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. instagram/1: this line asserts "researchers traced" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. linkedin/1: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. linkedin/1: this line asserts "researchers identified", "root causes" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. youtube/1: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim.
  10. 06:03:31decision.captionreject — instagram/1: this line asserts "rehri goth", "discovered something unexpected" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. instagram/2: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/1: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/1: this line asserts "found something unexpected" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. youtube/2: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim.
  11. 06:02:14decision.captionreject — instagram/1: the mapping quotes "1 in 4 babies in the Pakistani fishing settlement of Rehri Goth are born prematurely, nearly double the national rate", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. instagram/1: this line states "one", "1", "4" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. instagram/2: the mapping quotes "1 in 4 babies in the Pakistani fishing settlement of Rehri Goth are born prematurely, nearly double the national rate of 14%", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. instagram/2: the mapping quotes "Half of premature babies born in poor countries at around 32 weeks are likely to die", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. instagram/2: this line states "half", "32" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. linkedin/1: the mapping quotes "1 in 4 babies in the Pakistani fishing settlement of Rehri Goth are born prematurely, nearly double the national rate of 14%", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. linkedin/1: the mapping quotes "Factors contributing to early birth in Rehri Goth include malnutrition, extreme heat, and poor sanitation", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. linkedin/1: the mapping quotes "Researchers at Agha Khan University found the bacterium Prevotella copri was far scarcer in women who delivered prematurely", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. linkedin/1: this line states "1", "4", "half" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. linkedin/2: the mapping quotes "Nearly 1 in 4 babies in the Pakistani fishing settlement of Rehri Goth are born prematurely, nearly double the national rate of 14%", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. linkedin/2: the mapping quotes "Factors contributing to early birth in Rehri Goth include malnutrition, extreme heat, and poor sanitation", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. linkedin/2: the mapping quotes "Improving education, water, and sanitation could solve half the premature birth problems in the community", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. linkedin/2: this line states "1", "4", "half" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/1: the mapping quotes "Half born around 32 weeks in low-income countries don't survive", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. youtube/1: this line states "half", "32" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/2: the mapping quotes "Premature birth rates in Rehri Goth, Pakistan are nearly double the national average of 14%", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. youtube/2: the mapping quotes "Malnutrition, extreme heat, poor sanitation contribute to early births", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. youtube/2: the mapping quotes "Researchers at Agha Khan University found the bacterium Prevotella copri was far scarcer in women who delivered prematurely", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. youtube/2: this line states "half" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim.
  12. 06:00:54decision.captionreject — instagram/1: this line states "half" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. instagram/2: this line states "first", "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. linkedin/1: this line asserts "learn how" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. linkedin/2: this line asserts "visible causes" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. youtube/2: this line asserts "see how" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim.
  13. 05:59:17decision.captionreject — linkedin/1: this line states "half" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. linkedin/2: this line asserts "experts say" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. youtube/1: this line states "one", "four" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/2: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/2: this line asserts "much larger" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim.
  14. 05:57:56decision.captionreject — linkedin/1: this line asserts "rehri goth" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. youtube/1: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/1: this line asserts "one pakistani fishing settlement" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim.
  15. 05:57:23decision.captionreject — linkedin/1: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. linkedin/2: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/2: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim.
  16. 05:56:59decision.captionreject — linkedin/1: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. linkedin/2: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/1: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/2: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim.
  17. 05:53:45decision.captionreject — linkedin/1: this line asserts "rehri goth" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. youtube/1: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. youtube/1: this line asserts "one pakistani fishing settlement", "rehri goth faces", "researchers discovered", "real culprit involves something invisible" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. youtube/2: this line asserts "agha khan university researchers identified" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim.
  18. 05:49:37decision.captionreject — linkedin/1: this line states "one" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. linkedin/1: this line asserts "one pakistani fishing settlement", "real drivers" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. youtube/1: this line asserts "real causes" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim.
  19. 03:06:37publishpublished 69.00s at -16.0 LUFS
  20. 03:04:25approveApproved by tarik
  21. 03:00:17narrateblock 6 voiced by elevenlabs at 9.265s$0.0332
  22. 03:00:17narrateblock 5 voiced by elevenlabs at 10.24s$0.0691
  23. 03:00:17narrateblock 4 voiced by elevenlabs at 10.312s$0.0392
  24. 03:00:17narrateblock 3 voiced by elevenlabs at 10.75s$0.0700
  25. 03:00:17narrateblock 2 voiced by elevenlabs at 10.588s$0.0636
  26. 03:00:17narrateblock 1 voiced by elevenlabs at 9.237s$0.0961
  27. 02:58:31blocksblock 6 ready on seedance-1-0-pro-fast-251015$0.1560
  28. 02:58:31blocksblock 5 ready on seedance-1-0-pro-fast-251015$0.1560
  29. 02:58:31blocksblock 4 ready on seedance-1-0-pro-fast-251015$0.1560
  30. 02:58:31blocksblock 3 ready on seedance-1-0-pro-fast-251015$0.1560
  31. 02:58:31blocksblock 2 ready on seedance-1-0-pro-fast-251015$0.1560
  32. 02:58:31blocksblock 1 ready on seedance-1-0-pro-fast-251015$0.1560
  33. 02:49:27script6 blocks written
  34. 02:49:27decision.scriptpass — 6 blocks, every claim traced to a fact after 5 repair pass(es)
  35. 02:48:54decision.scriptreject — block 2: POL-5 — 30 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~11.5s. | block 5: POL-5 — 33 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~12.7s. (after 8 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  36. 02:48:07decision.scriptreject — block 2: POL-5 — 29 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~11.2s. | block 4: POL-5 — 31 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~11.9s. | block 5: POL-5 — 28 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~10.8s. (after 8 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  37. 02:47:27decision.scriptreject — block 6: POL-5 — 15 words (need 23-27); 1 sentence (need 2-3) — sentence-end pauses are what fill the ten-second window, so one long sentence runs short. Estimated ~5.8s. (after 8 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  38. 02:44:41decision.scriptreject — block 4: POL-5 — 32 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~12.3s. (after 8 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  39. 02:43:46decision.scriptreject — block 3: POL-5 — 30 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~11.5s. | block 5: POL-5 — 31 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~11.9s. | block 3: this line asserts "agha khan university discovered" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. | block 5: this line asserts "world health organization states" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. (after 8 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  40. 02:43:09decision.scriptreject — block 3: POL-5 — 28 words (need 23-27); 1 sentence (need 2-3) — sentence-end pauses are what fill the ten-second window, so one long sentence runs short. Estimated ~10.8s. | block 4: POL-5 — 31 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~11.9s. | block 3: this line asserts "agha khan university identified" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. (after 8 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  41. 02:42:31decision.scriptreject — block 3: POL-5 — 29 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~11.2s. | block 3: this line asserts "scientists identified" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. (after 8 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  42. 02:41:59decision.scriptreject — block 3: POL-5 — 28 words (need 23-27); 1 sentence (need 2-3) — sentence-end pauses are what fill the ten-second window, so one long sentence runs short. Estimated ~10.8s. | block 6: this line states "one", "four", "eight" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. (after 8 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  43. 02:41:04decision.scriptreject — block 3: POL-5 — 32 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~12.3s. (after 8 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  44. 02:28:26errorstage script failed: no block survived checking — block 3: POL-5 — 28 words (need 23-27); 1 sentence (need 2-3) — sentence-end pauses are what fill the ten-second window, so one long sentence runs short. Estimated ~10.8s. | block 5: POL-5 — 34 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~13.1s. | block 3: this line asserts "agha khan university identified" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. | block 4: this line states "three" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. | block 4: this line asserts "all contribute", "early birth", "rehri goth" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. | block 5: this line asserts "world health organization states" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. (after 6 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  45. 02:28:26decision.scriptreject — block 3: POL-5 — 28 words (need 23-27); 1 sentence (need 2-3) — sentence-end pauses are what fill the ten-second window, so one long sentence runs short. Estimated ~10.8s. | block 5: POL-5 — 34 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~13.1s. | block 3: this line asserts "agha khan university identified" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. | block 4: this line states "three" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. | block 4: this line asserts "all contribute", "early birth", "rehri goth" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. | block 5: this line asserts "world health organization states" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. (after 6 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  46. 02:26:35errorstage script failed: no block survived checking — block 2: POL-5 — 34 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~13.1s. | block 3: POL-5 — 28 words (need 23-27); 1 sentence (need 2-3) — sentence-end pauses are what fill the ten-second window, so one long sentence runs short. Estimated ~10.8s. | block 4: POL-5 — 30 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~11.5s. | block 1: the mapping quotes "about one in four babies in the Pakistani fishing settlement of Rehri Goth are born prematurely, nearly double the national rate of fourteen percent", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. | block 1: this line states "one", "four", "fourteen percent" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. | block 1: this block traces to no fact at all. Its role is "cold open", which is reporting — only the kicker may be pure framing. Map at least one assertion to a fact, or replace the block. | block 3: the mapping quotes "Scientists at Agha Khan University have identified a bacterium called Prevotella copri that was far less present in women who delivered prematurely compared to women who delivered at term", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. | block 3: this block traces to no fact at all. Its role is "evidence", which is reporting — only the kicker may be pure framing. Map at least one assertion to a fact, or replace the block. (after 6 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  47. 02:26:35decision.scriptreject — block 2: POL-5 — 34 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~13.1s. | block 3: POL-5 — 28 words (need 23-27); 1 sentence (need 2-3) — sentence-end pauses are what fill the ten-second window, so one long sentence runs short. Estimated ~10.8s. | block 4: POL-5 — 30 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~11.5s. | block 1: the mapping quotes "about one in four babies in the Pakistani fishing settlement of Rehri Goth are born prematurely, nearly double the national rate of fourteen percent", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. | block 1: this line states "one", "four", "fourteen percent" without tracing to a fact. Map it or cut it — a number on screen is a claim. | block 1: this block traces to no fact at all. Its role is "cold open", which is reporting — only the kicker may be pure framing. Map at least one assertion to a fact, or replace the block. | block 3: the mapping quotes "Scientists at Agha Khan University have identified a bacterium called Prevotella copri that was far less present in women who delivered prematurely compared to women who delivered at term", which is not in this line. The mapping has drifted from the narration. | block 3: this block traces to no fact at all. Its role is "evidence", which is reporting — only the kicker may be pure framing. Map at least one assertion to a fact, or replace the block. (after 6 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  48. 02:21:51errorstage script failed: no block survived checking — block 2: POL-5 — 21 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~8.1s. | block 5: POL-5 — 1 sentence (need 2-3) — sentence-end pauses are what fill the ten-second window, so one long sentence runs short. Estimated ~8.8s. | block 6: POL-5 — 22 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~8.5s. | block 2: this block traces to no fact at all. Its role is "stakes", which is reporting — only the kicker may be pure framing. Map at least one assertion to a fact, or replace the block. (after 6 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  49. 02:21:51decision.scriptreject — block 2: POL-5 — 21 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~8.1s. | block 5: POL-5 — 1 sentence (need 2-3) — sentence-end pauses are what fill the ten-second window, so one long sentence runs short. Estimated ~8.8s. | block 6: POL-5 — 22 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~8.5s. | block 2: this block traces to no fact at all. Its role is "stakes", which is reporting — only the kicker may be pure framing. Map at least one assertion to a fact, or replace the block. (after 6 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  50. 02:20:10errorstage script failed: no block survived checking — block 2: POL-5 — 28 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~10.8s. | block 3: POL-5 — 32 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~12.3s. | block 4: POL-5 — 35 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~13.5s. | block 6: POL-5 — 20 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~7.7s. | block 3: this line asserts "world health organization says" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. (after 6 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)
  51. 02:20:10decision.scriptreject — block 2: POL-5 — 28 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~10.8s. | block 3: POL-5 — 32 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~12.3s. | block 4: POL-5 — 35 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~13.5s. | block 6: POL-5 — 20 words (need 23-27). Estimated ~7.7s. | block 3: this line asserts "world health organization says" without tracing to a fact. Map the whole assertion — not just the number in it — to the fact that supports it, or cut it. Everything on screen is a claim. (after 6 attempts — surfacing rather than retrying further)